| Criteria | Failed to Meet Minimum Standards 0–95 | Barely Meets Minimum Standards 60+% – D 96–111 | Meets Minimum Standards 70+% – C 112–127 | Good 80+% – B 128–143 | Superior 90+% – A 144–160 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title Page and Table of Contents (5 Points) | Page not provided. (0) | Title but no TOC. (2) | Title and attempted TOC. (3) | Title and TOC but Table without page numbers. (4) | Title of your applied research paper. Your name, course number and title, instructor, and date, plus appropriate TOC. (5) |
| Introduction (10 Points) | Introduction is not apparent. (0) | Introduction is vague, incomplete, or lacks focus. (6) | Introduction reflects barely adequate information to acquaint reader to the problem context. (7) | Contains a focus and provides sufficient detail to set the stage for the analysis but may contain extraneous information. (8) | Introduction has a sharp, distinct focus; complete information. (10) |
| Problem Statement (15 Points) | No problem statement apparent. (0) | Problem statement is vague; does not agree with title of paper. (9) | Presented mostly as symptoms of the problem. (11) | Presented as a disguised solution. (13) | Focused and concise. (15) |
| Literature Review (40 Points) | None provided. (0) | Too shallow; insufficient depth; provides review of only one source; does not cite sources properly; may include analysis of the problem in this section. (27) | Provides a review of only two to three sources; does not address topic areas germane to the problem; including analysis of the problem; does not cite some sources properly. (31) | Provides a review of the minimum six research articles; lacks reference to insights or findings from many of the readings that are applicable to the problem. (35) | Discusses the concepts, ideas, or insights that have the most value for helping make sense of problem; excellent use of citations; follows proper citation protocol; exceeds all standards defined in the Syllabus guidelines for the project. (40) |
| Analysis (40 Points) | No analysis evident or presents a simplistic, inappropriate, or incoherent analysis of or response to the problem. (0) | Illogically analyses the problem; may lack coherent structure or elaboration with examples. Does not apply findings from literature review. Clear lack of evidence to support analysis; makes broad generalizations and unsupported assertions. (27) | Presents an adequate analysis of the problem, elaborating the analysis with sufficient examples and acceptable reasoning. May not apply findings from literature review appropriately. Lack of evidence to support analysis; making broad generalizations and unsupported assertions. (31) | Presents a thoughtful analysis of problem, elaborating that response with appropriate examples and sensible reasoning. (35) | Presents a cogent analysis of the stated problem, elaborating that response with well-chosen examples and persuasive reasoning supported by the literature. (40) |
| Solution (30 Points) | Solutions and recommendation not included. (0) | The choice of solution(s) is not linked to the analysis. (20) | Presents only a single solution that may or may not be fully supported by the analysis. (23) | Solution or recommendations linked to the analysis. Partially supported and defended. (26) | Solution or recommendations logically flow from the analysis. Well-supported and defended. (30) |
| Reflection (10 Points) | No reflective statement offered. (0) | Perfunctory effort at drawing lessons from the assignment. (6) | One key lesson; no other insights offered. (7) | Good faith effort in discussing the lessons from the assignment; some insights are included. (8) | Well-presented insights on how the assignment influenced personal, academic, and professional development. (10) |
| References (10 Points) | Few or no references listed. (0) | Insufficient references listed; inconsistent format. (6) | A few appropriate references listed. (7) | Well-chosen references used; minor errors. (8) | Well-chosen references used; follows correct format for listing; no errors. (10) |
| NOTE: Points will be deducted for grammar, syntax, and punctuation errors. Failure to cite sources properly or using incorrect protocol when citing sources and listing references is cause for point reduction. Failure to cite sources will result in a submission for academic integrity review. | |||||
Call us 24/7:
+1 415 256 4347
Barely Meets
How to place an order?
Take a few steps to place an order on our site:
- Fill out the form and state the deadline.
- Calculate the price of your order and pay for it with your credit card.
- When the order is placed, we select a suitable writer to complete it based on your requirements.
- Stay in contact with the writer and discuss vital details of research.
- Download a preview of the research paper. Satisfied with the outcome? Press “Approve.”
Feel secure when using our service
It's important for every customer to feel safe. Thus, at Term paper champions, we take care of your security.
Financial security You can safely pay for your order using secure payment systems.
Personal security Any personal information about our customers is private. No other person can get access to it.
Academic security To deliver no-plagiarism samples, we use a specially-designed software to check every finished paper.
Web security This website is protected from illegal breaks. We constantly update our privacy management.
Get assistance with placing your order. Clarify any questions about our services. Contact our support team. They are available 24\7.
Still thinking about where to hire experienced authors and how to boost your grades? Place your order on our website and get help with any paper you need. We’ll meet your expectations.