“The women’s movement should focus on improving the descriptive representation of women in the House of Commons”
SUMMARY
-Develop an argument for or against the position.
You should reflect on the obstacles and benefits of different approaches to policy change.
-In your paper you should draw on specific examples of policy success or failure in order to support your position.
REQUIRMENTS
8-10 pages excluding reference and cover page.
– The writer should take the position of improving descriptive representation
-However, by doing so, I request that the writer examine the complex relationship between the two types of representation (descriptive and substantive)
-Argument should be that descriptive representation is necessary in politics, but there are some complex factors within substantive representation that should also be acknowledged.
-Although it is a argument paper, writer should be critical towards both types of representation by examining the complexities between the two.
STRUCTURE
-Intro including a brief but through explanation to the topic of the essay and what will be examined within the paper
-Intro MUST include a clear argument
-Dedicate a good portion of the paper to outlining and examining the strengths and obstacles of both representation
– Study the complex relationship
-Also Include a case study that illustrates the benefits of descriptive representation
– PAPER SHOULD E STRUCTURED CLEARLY
ADDITIONAL REQUIRMENTS
-ALL SOURCES MUST BE ACADEMIC
-I request that there be NO plagiarism and paraphrasing be kept at a minimum.
-Please include a Bibliography
-Perfect Grammer and Spelling would be appriciated
-Also, Canadian Spell Check would be great