1. we encountered the Roman theorist Horace, who believed that drama should instruct as well as entertain. Comedy, he believed, was instructed by ridiculing foolish behavior; people would change their behavior in order to avoid ridicule. Eighteenth-century dramatists believed that the best way to instruct was to present a positive figure that could be imitated by audience members. Discuss both approaches as evidenced in contemporary comedy, particularly the television sitcom. Is one more prominent than the other? Which do you believe is more effective (And why) ? at least seven sentences
2. Please read your classmate’s post and write five full sentences response to her/him Please note that: Examples of effective responses include: a thoughtful inquiry, an elaboration of an idea, a challenge to their premise, a connection between your post and your classmate’s. Be thorough in your response and thoughtful in the application of ethical discourse. (Response to classmate should write separate paragraph)
classmate’s post:
I feel as though the audience connects more with powerful story lines that include some entertaining features as opposed to just being entertained by something funny (a sitcom, for example). Now-a-days, more and more people like to feel connections on personal levels, even with TV shows and/or music. For example, in my mind, I feel like comedy shows can prove to be lacking character if it’s all humorous with no moral or negative aspects throughout the program. Lately, I’ve seen more shows and movies blend both comedy and darker elements into one story and it’s become very appealing in today’s age. Overall, when it comes down to conveying a specific message or moral, something dramatic may work more effectively than something solely focusing on creating laughter and happiness.